Artwork By – Viktoriia Seliverstova
With a background in project management, Zacc focuses on supporting Skribbl’s core operations and ongoing management functions.
Balancing Progress and Preservation
The swift integration of GenAI image generators in the creative sector has sparked debates about their potential influence on artists and the broader art ecosystem.
These technologies are adept at producing lifelike images from text descriptions or emulating established artistic styles.
Yet, beyond the allure of technological progression, lie challenges that could diminish the intrinsic value of human creativity.
As AI increasingly obscures the line between original and AI-generated content, both artists and brands face dilemmas over copyright, ownership, and financial implications for those whose art is their livelihood.
Implications for Brands
Brands contemplating GenAI use in creative projects must balance potential advantages against inherent risks.
Although GenAI can reduce production time and costs, issues of authenticity are paramount.
Employing GenAI risks diluting the unique artistic essence that distinguishes brands in a competitive market.
Furthermore, copyright complexities could lead to reputational harm, potentially altering the brand’s core identity towards an association with generic, machine-generated content.
Displacement of Artists
A pressing issue is GenAI’s capability to replicate individual artistic styles, posing a threat to artists in their domain.
These systems, trained on extensive datasets often comprising works by human artists (often without consent), can replicate various styles.
The increasing accessibility of image generators raises concerns among artists about competing with machines that can churn out endless imagery, potentially devaluing human-made art.
The legal ramifications of using copyrighted material to train AI systems remain ambiguous.
In the EU, regulations are in the works to mandate companies to document the use of copyrighted training data in GenAI.
In the US, artists have initiated legal actions against major tech firms over copyright disputes.
Yet, the existing legal framework seems inadequate to address the complexities introduced by AI-generated art.
The Loss of Human Essence in Art
Art mirrors human emotions, experiences, and innate creativity.
The encroachment of machines on this creative domain risks eroding the unique value artists contribute to society.
The genuine spontaneity, imperfections, and emotional depth in human-made art could become overshadowed by the mechanical precision of AI creations.
A Constructive Path Forward
To address these issues, it’s vital to implement measures that safeguard the role of human artists.
Experts advocate for the restriction of AI-generated imagery to reference purposes only, clearly distinguishing it from human-crafted works.
Encouraging ethical discussions on AI use in art and pushing for regulations that ensure artists’ consent and fair compensation when their works are utilised to train AI represent progressive steps.
At Only Human Art, we are at the forefront of preserving genuine human artistry.
We honour and celebrate collaborations with human artists.
As technology evolves, it should not eclipse human creativity.
The interplay between AI and art demands careful navigation to foster innovation while respecting and valuing human artistry.
In this digital era, our choices will shape the narrative of art and creativity amidst AI advancements.
This narrative must celebrate and protect the unique contributions of human artists, ensuring creativity remains distinctly human as we venture into the uncharted realms of artificial intelligence.
At Only Human Art, our mission is to highlight how partnerships between brands and artists bring new creativity to the business world. We focus on showing the special ways these collaborations work and how they change the way we think about art and business together.
© 2023. Only Human Art